|
|
|
|
Partnering
with Patients – A Team Approach It
has been said that there is a silver lining in every dark cloud.
I always believed that to be true; however, it wasn’t until I was
overcome by the dark clouds of Lyme disease infection, that I was able to
actually experience this phenomenon. For,
if I had not contracted a debilitating Lyme infection from a tick bite, I would
not have been fortunate enough to meet Dr. Murray Susser and his warm and
radiant wife, Phyllis. I
feel greatly blessed through acquiring such cherished friendships in my
association with the Lyme community. Dr.
Susser has exhibited thoughtful medical care, compassion, generosity and
friendship, and it was most memorable for me to peer through his panoramic
window of medical experience during this interview.
May I present the delightfully comical and impressive, Dr. Tina:
So, Dr. Susser, it is also said that the journey of a thousand miles
begins with the first step. With
regard to your journey through medicine, would you please tell us what that
first step was for you? Dr.
Susser: Yes.
I graduated from the University of Pittsburgh Medical School in 1966. I
went into family practice and very quickly, within the first year, I realized
that medicine didn’t work the way I wanted it to.
In other words, it wasn’t to my satisfaction.
I started looking for alternative solutions, because people weren’t
getting better. I tried a lot of
different things, and finally, I stumbled onto Vitamin E.
A friend of mine kept bugging me to read a book called Vitamin E for
Ailing and Healthy Hearts by Wilfrid E. Shute, M.D.
At the time I told my friend, “This is a quack book, but I’ll read it
if you promise to never ask me about vitamins again.” So, I
read the book and Shute talked about treating 30,000 people with Vitamin E and
all the great results he had with scar tissue, heart disease, high blood
pressure, venous disease and blood clots, impotency and sexual dysfunction and
all sorts of various disorders. At
first I thought this guy must have been confabulating or was Baron von
Munchausen. Around
that time, a patient came to see me who had suffered with venous disease of her
legs for thirty years and had seen many doctors.
She had terrible varicose veins that would develop infection and swelling
and phlegmasia alba dolans. Phlegmasia
means swelling, alba means whitish and dolans means pain.
So, she had white, swollen, painful legs.
If you just touched them with your finger, she would scream.
There is a test, the So, I
asked her about all the ordinary things that could be used and she had used all
of them and none of them had worked. Then
I remembered Wilfrid Shute had said Vitamin E 800 units a day.
So, I sent her to the drug store to get 800 units a day of Vitamin E, and
she started doing that. When she
came back in three weeks, she was almost cured!
I was stunned! When I put the
blood pressure cuff around her leg, I ran it up to the top, 300 milliliters of
mercury and there was no pain. I was
really excited and thought, “This cannot be a coincidence; this is a
miracle.” The funny thing is, the
woman wasn’t the least bit surprised and almost not appreciative.
She just thought I was doing my job by getting her better. I
followed her for a couple months more and she was virtually cured with 800 units
of Vitamin E a day. At the time, 800
units scared me, because I thought it was a high dose.
I now sometimes put people on 20,000 units and I’ve had good results
doing that. And I have a patient now
who has been getting an epidural injection for spinal pain every two months for
years. I started her on 10,000 units
of Vitamin E a day and she’s worked up to 17,000 units, but she’s now gone
eleven months without an epidural. Now
Vitamin E doesn’t work too well on nerve pain, but does work on bruises, soft
tissue pain, sunburn and spider and
insect bites very well. It also
works for post-accident, soft-tissue injuries.
So, they called me the “Vitamin E King” because I’ve used so much
Vitamin E. And
all this business about Vitamin E being dangerous was the biggest propaganda of
all time. It was based on a meta
analysis, which is a study in which you take a bunch of lousy studies, put them
together in a statistical manner and statistically maneuver it, to show that you
compare some parameter with the treatment you’re interested in.
So, I think the way they did it was with twenty-some studies comparing
patient death with the amount of Vitamin E they took.
That wasn’t only what the study was about; that was the data in the
study. They took the seven studies
with the highest death rates and found out how much Vitamin E these people were
using and they found that these people were using more Vitamin E than the other
studies. So, they said that high
Vitamin E was related to high death rate. Then
they published that study as if it were factual, but it was skewed.
You know what Mark Twain said about statistics--that there are three
kinds of lies—there are lies, damn lies and there are statistics. It’s
just like the Bible; the Devil can quote scripture to suit his purpose.
So, anyhow, I got into Vitamin E and that opened the door for me.
Then I started to look for more and more alternatives.
And I was very excited. On my
regular hospital rounds, I went into the doctors’ dining room where I went
every day for lunch. I said, “Hey!
Look what I found!” And all
the doctors told me it was nonsense. They
said, “Oh, Susser, you’re crazy! It
was just coincidence!” But it
wasn’t coincidence; it was way, way out of the realm of coincidence.
They couldn’t believe that Vitamin E could be that powerful. I saw
it happen, so I knew it was true. That
started me on my odyssey in nutrition. I
saw a lot of surprising things happen. I
had one guy who was scheduled to have a heart transplant, in the early days of
heart transplants, when patients would live for a week afterwards at most.
He got mad and walked out of the hospital, because he was waiting for a
donor. He came to see me and said,
“I don’t have long to live. Put
me on something, some Valium maybe.” I
asked him if he wanted to try some Vitamin E.
He said, “What’ve I got to lose?”
So I
put him on Vitamin E, and a year later he was playing golf and carrying his
clubs without a cart! He never had a
heart transplant, never had heart surgery, and he was fine for a long, long
time. Then shortly after that, he
called with an emergency saying he had stomach pain.
It was the day after Thanksgiving and he said he ate too much turkey.
I thought it may have been his heart, so I put him in coronary care.
He insisted that it was his stomach, but I didn’t want to take any
chances with him. So I
had Brian Kennedy, my cardiology friend, see him.
Kennedy said, “This is an amazing case.
This guy was supposed to have a heart transplant.
He should have been dead a long time ago.”
I said, “Well, Brian, what do you think of vitamin E?”
And he walked away. And he
was a good friend. But he couldn’t
see the possibility that Vitamin E could have done this. Tina:
It’s really hard for some doctors to “cross over” isn’t it? Dr.
Susser: Well, it wasn’t too hard
for me. A lot of doctors see it and
they don’t believe it. They’re
afraid to think outside the box. Remember,
I was a jet fighter pilot -- now we’re talking fear. Tina:
Is it something one picks up in medical school that causes this denial? Dr.
Susser: But seriously, I think it
has to do with the way we’re brought up. I
had a lonely upbringing. My father
was estranged and had a bad accident when I was younger and my mother was busy
working and taking care of the family.
She was too busy to pay much attention to me.
I was the youngest of five. Nobody
paid much attention to me, and I had to grow up on my own.
I didn’t have a lot of dogma telling me how to live in the world.
So, I had to learn everything myself.
I had a good brain, I always made good grades, I had a good memory and I
could learn quickly. I
grew up in a very smart family, everyone was very smart.
So, I did things in my own way. It’s
not a big leap of faith for me to see something that’s not in the conventional
box. So, what I wound up doing,
which was really most interesting and satisfying to me, was to treat people who
slipped through the cracks of conventional medicine. First
I learned about Vitamin E and then I read Linus Pauling on Vitamin C.
I saw the miracles with Vitamin C, too.
I read Adele Davis who was a great nutritional guru who wrote some great
books around that time. I got her on
the phone and she was excited to hear from an M.D. who was interested in
nutritional medicine. I went to a
convention in These
great nutritionists were all marginalized by conventional medicine.
They were all considered quacks and attacked in various ways by the
media. I kept a low profile and just
did my nutritional stuff, and then I went to a meeting and learned abut
hypoglycemia from Harold Harper and Carlton Fredericks.
Conventional docs thought that hypoglycemia was another non-disease, a
notion. Hypoglycemia is very real. Tina:
Was there testing for it at the time? It
was hard to test; it was a clinical diagnosis.
You can do a glucose tolerance test and find hypoglycemia, but it’s a
miserable test. The conventional
docs wouldn’t agree to it, though. Hypoglycemia
was defined as having blood sugar below 40, but your average blood sugar was 65
to 115. Now they’ve made it 65 to
99, which means that the American Diabetic Association can get more people
called diabetic. They keep lowering
the levels. For instance, blood
pressure of 140 was considered borderline. Now,
120 over 80 is considered normal and 121 is now considered pre-hypertensive, so
they can give hypertensive drugs much sooner.
Anyhow,
I started learning about hypoglycemia. The
normal hypoglycemic level of 65 is way too low; the normal should not be less
than 90 or 85. They call 65 the low
normal and they call 40 hypoglycemia. So,
what is it if it’s between 40 and 65? I
was at an affair at the medical school and I saw Dr. Fielding, who was our Chief
Endocrinologist and my endocrinology professor while I was in medical school.
So, I said, “Dr. Fielding, I have a question about blood sugars.
If 65 is the low normal and 40 is hypoglycemia, what is 50?”
And he answered, “Borderline.” You
mean that whole realm from 40 to 65 is borderline and 70 is normal? So,
it was considered a non-disease and never treated.
In fact, the New England Journal of Medicine published an editorial on
the epidemic of a non-disease called hypoglycemia.
It’s really a form of malnutrition and has to do with all sorts of
problems including depression, anxiety, confusion--and obesity is very much
related to hypoglycemia. So I went
from disease to disease just like that. Then
I learned about chelation and treated vascular disease with intravenous
chelation and became experienced and successful doing that.
This helped a lot of people and I had a lot of success with patients
using chelation. Tina:
I had a primary care physician once who refused to consult with my Lyme
doc, because my Lyme doc used chelation. The
PCP surprised me by telling me that he signed a promise or statement when he
finished medical school that he would never use chelation.
I thought that was outrageous. Dr.
Susser: Chelation wasn’t that
popular when I graduated, but that’s almost violating something in the
Constitution. I think that’s an
unconstitutional thing to do. I
can’t imagine a medical school would do that. Chelation
means metal-binding. It was
originally used, and is still used, for heavy metal poisoning.
However, in conventional medical wisdom, chelation is only used
for heavy duty metal poisonings. That
would mean a lethal amount from a laboratory or an industrial accident, or if a
child gets into a bucket of paint or eats paint chips, or someone swallows
mercury. The chelators used would be
EDTA or BAL, which is a mercury chelating agent. These
chelators bind lead, cadmium, mercury, tin, silver and nickel.
The most toxic metals we deal with are mercury, lead and cadmium.
It’s interesting that mercury wasn’t even discovered as a toxin until
about twenty years ago. When I used
to do hair analysis and I’d find high mercury, I would wonder what that would
mean. No one seemed to know.
Then Hal Huggins did some important work with mercury in his dentistry
practice in The
poisonous level we’re talking about is several orders of magnitude below the
laboratory and industrial poisoning. It’s
a low-grade, insidious poisoning that poisons our arteries, our brains and our
endocrine and immune systems. Tina:
Which is really important in our day and age, right?
Aren’t we being bombarded with these toxic metals? Dr.
Susser: Well, improvements have been
made, such as removing lead from paint, gasoline, solder and pipes.
We used to have a lot of exposure to lead, but we’ve decreased it
enormously. It is still too much,
though. Mercury has been a major
problem, but they’re decreasing that. Except
now all the new light bulbs will have mercury in them and that’s going to
cause a mess. There is still lead in
some of our water pipes, and there are other industrial sources as well.
Breathing gasoline fumes and getting gasoline on your skin can cause
exposure to lead, also. A big
source of mercury is fish like tuna and swordfish, which are heavily loaded with
it. Silver amalgam fillings in teeth
are fifty percent mercury and we’re getting a lot of mercury from those.
Many dentists are stopping this practice, but the American Dental
Association has managed to keep them legal and is still saying that
silver-mercury amalgams are a valid thing to do.
There are some countries now which are banning these amalgams, especially
in pregnant women and children. I
think Mercury
also comes from the fumes of power plants that burn coal and other fossil fuels.
So, if you’re near a power plant that’s spewing out smoke, it’s
probably pretty polluted. There are
silver-mercury batteries and mercury switches in our walls and lights.
We’ve gotten rid of mercury thermometers, so that helps.
The heavy metal picture is probably, overall, getting better.
However, chelation is something that can be a real deterrent to
accumulating these metals. Tina:
I’ve heard that chelation works on plaque in arteries. Dr.
Susser: As a doctor who uses
chelation, I legally can’t say that chelation works on arteries.
I can tell you that my experience is that chelation takes cadmium and
lead out of the arterial wall, and cadmium and lead, and mercury to some extent,
are known to block the action of nitric oxide.
Nitric oxide opens arteries and is blocked by these heavy metals.
Therefore, logically, you would think that by blocking the nitric oxide,
your arteries would tend to clamp down, spasm, close up and cause damage.
Nitric oxide is a natural substance in our bodies that is made in large
part from arginine, which is an amino acid.
So, taking amino acids is a good way to open up your arteries.
We’ve found that arginine is very helpful in high blood pressure,
because high blood pressure will result from lack of nitric oxide. Chelation
is really wonderful in many ways. It
cleans out these toxic elements in your body.
It may be hard not to eat tuna fish, swordfish, halibut, king mackerel
and even orange roughy is pretty high in mercury.
This is interesting; you know, the safest fish you can eat is wild
salmon, because it has beautiful oils and it has almost no mercury because it
eats krill. Krill does not
accumulate mercury. Whereas, farm
salmon eat small fish and small fish have mercury in them.
The more fish they eat, the more mercury they accumulate.
This is called biomagnification. So,
farm salmon biomagnify the mercury like any other big fish.
If
you don’t study it, it’s hard to know what’s safe to eat.
I still love tuna sushi and I know when I’m eating the mercury it’s
not good for me, but I take a lot of oral chelators, such as EDTA and DMSA.
Now, oral is not as good as intravenous chelation, because all the oral
chelators have to go through the liver where they use up most of their chelation
by taking toxic metals out of the liver. That’s
very good for you, but it doesn’t help the muscles or your other organs very
much. If you take the oral chelation long enough, maybe years or decades, and
get your liver completely cleaned out, then you start getting the other parts of
your body. These heavy metals have a
long half-life in the body. Lead,
cadmium and mercury probably have a half-life of between twenty and twenty-five
years. That means that, if you have
twice as much lead in your body as you’re supposed to have and if you don’t
do anything to get rid of it, it will take your body twenty years or more to get
it down to the ideal level. That is,
so long as you don’t add any more. Tina:
How do you integrate all this knowledge in your approach to patients? My
current practice is using all the elements that I’ve used over the years and
I’ve found that the disease that is the most damaging, the most prevalent that
slips through the cracks of conventional medicine the most, is Lyme disease.
Lyme disease is rampant in the east and it is becoming more and more
prevalent in the west. It was
discovered in These
are Ixodes ticks which bite this certain kind of deer that are common on the
east coast. These deer are often
infected with Lyme and other bacteria that can be carried by ticks.
So, there’s Lyme and the co-infections.
The co-infections are Babesiosis, Erlichiosis, Bartonella, Brucellosis,
mycobacteria, and of course, ticks carry the rickettsial diseases like Rocky
Mountain Spotted Fever. So, there
are a lot of things you can get from a tick bite, and some ticks will carry two
and three different bugs when they bite you.
They used to say that one tick out of a hundred would carry Lyme, but now
they’re saying one tick out of two will carry the disease. If
you get a tick bite, there’s a high likelihood of getting Lyme disease.
If you do get a tick bite, get the head of the tick out with a little
pair of pliers. Some people say you
can cook it out of there, but that doesn’t work.
A good thing to do is to save the tick, freeze it or put it in
formaldehyde and have it tested. In
the meantime, I would take antibiotics for three to four weeks and maybe longer,
just in case, because the likelihood of infection is too high. Tina:
This protocol is entirely different than the Infectious Diseases Society
of America treatment guidelines, which recommend only 200 mg of Doxycycline with
the fulfillment of some absolutely ludicrous attachment and endemic criteria.
I would take your treatment over theirs any day. Dr.
Susser: Yes, they’re really out of
touch, really out of touch. The
Infectious Diseases Society of America has been accused of having conflicts of
interest. The IDSA panel made the
announcement that chronic Lyme disease doesn’t really exist, and it turns out
they probably had financial interests with insurance companies.
The Attorney General of Connecticut brought charges against them. My
approach to patients is one of partnership in helping with their diseases.
I am the junior partner; the patient is in charge.
I will be the best advisor I can possibly be.
I will offer options, because most of the things that I do don’t have
rigid protocols. Like the old
days--strep throat, ten days of penicillin or pyelonephritis, seven days of
Keflex. There are a lot of rigid
protocols in medicine and most of the things I work with are conditions like
chronic fatigue syndrome, which is one that falls through the cracks.
It was mostly considered to be an emotional disorder or depression.
I’d say that if you had your life taken away by an illness, wouldn’t
you be depressed? So,
this book I wrote twenty years ago on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is still valid in
many ways, because the principles contained within it are what I apply to my
patient approach. I look at all the
possibilities and offer what certainty I can to patients.
One of my strengths in medicine is that I’m willing to live with
uncertainty and most doctors are not. For
example, one thing that I know is that something caused your disease, but I
don’t know what it is. It has to
be in some category or another—a bacteria or a toxin or allergy.
So, I take the most likely possibility and design a good safe therapeutic
trial and do that. Now, with Lyme,
the testing has recently given us much more certainty, with Igenex Lab and tests
like the CD57. There are a number of
things that give us much more information about Lyme. So, I
had a patient just today who had her tick bite twenty-some years ago, with a
bull’s eye rash and everything, and she’s probably been to fifteen doctors,
none of whom would believe she has Lyme. She
has Lyme tests from labs that don’t do well with Lyme and they came back
equivocal or negative, so she didn’t have Lyme by any standard for all these
years. Yet, she has all the classic
signs of Lyme—myalgia, arthralgia, brain fog, classical rash in I
even use the principals of Thomas McPherson Brown, who was the great
rheumatologist at Tina:
Have you ever treated a patient who presented with a bull’s eye rash? Dr.
Susser: Yes, and I treated the
patient for three weeks, and they never got Lyme.
And, of course, the earlier the diagnosis, the easier it is to treat. Tina:
Are you finding Lyme cases here in Dr.
Susser: I treat patients who
acquired Lyme in other states, and I have patients who travel from northern CFS
is another disease that slips through the cracks.
It was first named by Paul Cheney and Dan Peterson in That
led to confusion between Epstein Barr and CFS.
When they found out that CFS was not caused by EBV, they decided it was
an emotional disease and a form of depression.
It was a crippling disease and in some cases it probably was Lyme.
The definition of CFS is fifty percent debility for greater than six
months with no known cause. It also
has other symptoms like muscle pain, joint pain and swollen glands.
So, myalgia was a common accompaniment. In my
book that I wrote with Michael Rosenbaum, called Solving the Puzzle of
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, I came up with the idea prior to that of Mixed
Infection Syndrome. Again, the
wisdom of conventional medicine is that you can only have one infection at a
time until you’re dying, and then you can have all these opportunistic
infections that take hold. In my
opinion, “opportunistic” is a redundant word, because all infections are
opportunistic. They look for the
opportunity to invade. What they
mean is that an infection needs a real strong opportunity. We
are constant besieged with bacteria and various organisms in the body.
There are five hundred different bacteria that live in the gut. There
are hundreds that live in the mouth, live under our fingernails and live on the
skin. So, we have many different
bacteria. The total count in the gut
is variable. Some people say it’s
three trillion and some people say it’s much more than that.
How do you count them; it’s hard. The
point is that in CFS as a diagnosis, it will disappear when we are smart enough
to diagnose all the different infections and all the different toxicities that
can cause chronic fatigue. Lyme is a
perfect example. Lots of these
people we’ve labeled with CFS have Lyme disease.
When we discover the Lyme disease, it’s no longer CFS; it’s chronic
fatigue from Lyme disease. If they
also have Babesia or some other co-infection, it’s Mixed Infection Syndrome.
They commonly have been on antibiotics for one reason or another and get
an overgrowth of yeast in the gut. Then
they have some sort of fungal or yeast infection.
Then that opens the door to parasites and to other forms of bacteria that
can invade, such as clostridium dificile and things of that nature.
So, there are a number of organisms that will invade under these
circumstances, and the patient is not terminal.
The immune system is not totally collapsed.
It’s just collapsed enough. Then
there are confounding factors like toxic metals and toxic fungus and molds in
the house. One good thing about Lyme
and the co-infections is that they validate my theory from twenty years ago that
we get mixed infections. A
leaky roof or a leaky water pipe will lead to black mold, one of which is
Stachybotrys. Stachybotrys toxins
can be crippling and can lead to chronic fatigue and immune system depletion.
Then the yeast, bacteria and parasites can invade.
So, I would consider all these things in a patient with CFS symptoms, but
not necessarily test for all of them. When
you start testing for all these things, you run out of blood and money pretty
quick. If I tested for all the
things that are possible, I could drain somebody’s bank account and
their whole vascular system. Therefore,
I use my best clinical judgment, and I have a lot of experience doing that. Tina:
What would you say is the difference between Chronic Fatigue and
Fibromyalgia? Dr.
Susser: Aside from the fact that
they commonly occur together, it is a case of which came first—the chicken or
the egg—fibromyalgia means muscle pain and chronic fatigue is just that,
chronic fatigue. You can have one
without the other, but they commonly occur together.
Fibromyalgia is fatiguing, and some people start off with fatigue and the
fibromyalgia follows. Now
when it comes to Bb infections, the most important recommendation I have is to
be really aggressive. I use a
pincers approach. By that, I mean if
you just use antibiotics and don’t boost the immune system, you won’t see a
complete cure. If you just
strengthen the immune system, it’s almost never enough.
I’ve never seen a serious case of Lyme get better without antibiotics,
and I’ve tried. The important
thing with Lyme is to recognize that the Lyme organism metamorphosizes.
The Lyme organism starts off as a spirochete, a strong cell-wall
organism, and it’s hard to see under a microscope.
It’s long enough to be seen, but it’s very thin.
So, in order to see it under a microscope, you almost need to use a
darkfield or lightfield microscope. When
you treat it with antibiotics, you start off with an antibiotic that kills the
cell wall. The organism will start
to die, but it’s a slow-growing organism.
Most organisms with which we get infected are like E-coli, streptococcus,
staphylococcus, pneumococcus and gonococcus, and they’re fast-growing
organisms. They divide every twenty
minutes when they’re infecting, so you get three generations in an hour.
They are very vulnerable to antibiotics.
Lyme, on the other hand, divides every twenty hours.
Therefore, it’s much harder to kill.
Its metabolism is much slower and deliberate. If
you get chronic Lyme, you can understand that instead of taking ten days to
treat it, it can take ten months or more due to its slow replication.
When you combine that with the fact that it’s intracellular and it
hides very well from the immune system, hides from antibiotics, and
metamorphosizes from a cell-wall phase to an L form, which is a form that does
not have a cell wall, it becomes much more difficult to treat.
There are also the cyst form and the granular forms which are resistant
to most treatment and can remain dormant for years. There
are antibiotics that attack the protoplasm rather than the cell wall.
They don’t work as well on the cell-wall form, during early Lyme, but
somewhere around three weeks of azithromycin or clarithromycin (antibiotics we
like to use on Lyme), the cell-wall form will metamorphosize.
At first you may notice that you’ll start feeling better, and after
about three weeks, you may stop getting better.
So, then you add Doxycycline, and you continue both of them because the
forms keep shifting back and forth. At
the same time, you may be ignoring Babesia, which you may have if you haven’t
checked for that. Even if you have
checked for that, there are false negatives.
That’s
why a doctor has to use clinical judgment. So,
I often add Plaquenil, Metronidazole or some other parasitic drug, which can hit
Babesia. Babesia is like malaria;
it’s a parasite. There are a lot
of herbals and nutritional boosters for the immune system.
There’s a whole program I use including CoQ10, D-Ribose, L-Carnitine
and Carnisine, una de gato (cat’s claw), and Artemisia.
I like colostrum and sometimes colloidal silver and oral chelating
agents. So, there are a number of
things you can use, and it sometimes taxes the imagination to be able to
prioritize. I can think of three
hundred things that I could do, but I have to prioritize each case and find the
best thing for that person that is possible at that time. Tina:
That’s so wonderful that you have that individualized approach.
From a patient’s perspective, it’s so important that, after seeing so
many other doctors, to eventually find someone like you, Dr. Susser, who will
work with a person. Perhaps you have
already witnessed this in Lyme patients—that is, a bit of anxiety. Dr.
Susser: Oh, yes!
I’ve had patients who just burst into tears because someone finally
believed them! Tina:
Do you have any suggestions for other medical practitioners? Dr.
Susser: Be open to the possibility.
One thing about Lyme is to never get cocky about it.
Don’t ever get overly confident that you’ve reached a cure just
because somebody starts feeling better for a while.
I’ve seen a lot of relapses when people quit too soon.
That has to do with this twenty-hour replication rate and also with the
idea that Lyme is intracellular and hides from the immune system.
Remember that it can go into a cyst or granular form.
It can become dormant. There
are a lot of other diseases that are like that.
Tuberculosis is like that. Tina:
Why won’t the medical community accept that Lyme is like tuberculosis
in its ability to evade and lie dormant? Dr.
Susser: I don’t know.
There is lots of evidence to show Lyme’s ability to lay dormant.
Tuberculosis takes up to a year and a half to treat.
When you first catch tuberculosis, it may only seem like a mild flu.
It doesn’t necessarily cause a serious illness, and it leaves a little
calcified nodule in the lung that has live tuberculosis organisms in it that are
dormant. When
you get older, maybe 50 to 70 years old, you get pneumonia, cancer or some
debilitating condition like alcoholism, the tubercle breaks down and you get
tuberculosis. You then get a
cavitation in your lung and a terrible disease, but it’s something you caught
fifty years before. So, why would it
be a surprise that other bugs can do something like that? An
astounding aside to this conversation is that about hundreds of millions of
people worldwide are infected with dormant tuberculosis. Tina:
Have you observed an AIDS type syndrome develop from Lyme disease
infection? Dr.
Susser: I haven’t yet seen anyone
with Lyme as bad as terminal AIDS. I’ve
seen some people who are pretty sick, but not with AIDS.
AIDS is really dreadful. I
used to see a lot of AIDS before the protease inhibitors were made available.
These drugs suppress some of the action of the virus and they sure have
prolonged a lot of lives and improved quality of life.
I hardly see AIDS patients anymore. There
are some people that say that HIV has nothing to do with AIDS, and I don’t
believe that for a second. I think
there’s a very strong correlation from everything I’ve seen.
I haven’t seen anyone with AIDS that didn’t have a positive HIV.
Everyone with HIV starts getting the immune system changes and if you do
a T-cell subset, you see a lowering of the helper cells and an increase of the
suppressor cells. When the ratio
gets very low, the infections get very bad.
I saw
one young man die very quickly when he got pneumonia.
He needed to be hospitalized, so I sent him to UCLA, but he didn’t get
there in time. They started treating
him, but he died very quickly. Every
patient I’ve seen who had lethal AIDS had a positive HIV.
Then I started seeing the ones with lethal AIDS start turning around with
protease inhibitors, but most of them go to infectious disease doctors who
specialize in protease inhibitors Tina:
What is your take on the political aspect of Lyme disease? Be
politically active. I don’t know
who’s politically active in fighting people like the IDSA.
They’re very powerful, but ultimately, everything winds up political.
I have a saying. “If you
tell the truth and keep telling it, eventually, your word becomes the law of the
universe.” When
it comes to health, be proactive. The
more proactive a patient is with their health, the better they do, in my
experience. People often come to me
quite sheepish and apologetic. They
say, “I looked this up on the Internet and I don’t want to tell you how to
be a doctor and I don’t want to pretend I’m a doctor and such.”
This is all nonsense. Patients
don’t have to be apologetic for learning.
Information is information and knowledge is knowledge.
The important thing is to find somebody who can help you use that
knowledge, because nobody is going to get enough knowledge to deal with it
themselves. For
example, I could go to a lumber yard and buy everything I need to build a house.
If I built that house, I don’t think anybody would want to step in it.
I’m not going to be the one to build a house that you could live in or
even survive in for a moment. But
people learn enough to buy vitamins and sometimes drugs and do a lot of things
for themselves, but they can also damage themselves that way. I
have people who bring me lots of good information and I use it.
I remember reading about Sir William Osler; he was the modern
Hippocrates, the idol of medicine around the turn of the last century.
He was a brilliant clinician and people really listened to him and
followed his teachings. He had a lot
of sayings like Hippocrates. One of
the things that he said that always stuck in my mind was, “Listen to the
patient. He will tell you what’s
wrong with him.” So, I
consider that one of the most important things I ever learned in medicine.
It’s one thing to hear the words and another thing to hear the meaning.
I’m very careful to listen to the meaning and to hear everything the
patient says. A lot of doctors will
just jump from the superficial finding to this, this and this and seven minutes
later they’re done. You can’t do
Lyme in seven minutes. I can treat
an earache in seven minutes and tonsillitis in seven minutes, but that’s not
really treating the whole situation. Sometimes
you need to set up the immune system and nutritional system and find out whether
it’s the first tonsillitis they’ve ever had.
I can run people through and do an augensblick diagnosis—that’s
German for blink. I can
do that, but it’s not very satisfying and it’s not very safe.
You can miss some really important things if you don’t take a little
more time and dig a little deeper. If
people are frustrated and have a hunch that their doctor isn’t looking deeply
enough or hearing them well enough, change doctors.
Also change doctors if a doctor doesn’t want you to have another
opinion. If you’re not getting
well and your doctor doesn’t want you to have another opinion, then you need
another opinion. At least that’s
my feeling. Arizona
Advanced Medicine is Dr. Susser’s practice located in Scottsdale, For
more information visit Dr. Susser’s website at www.azadvancedmed.com. |
|
Thank You to Our Sponsors!
Entire site copyright 2008 by Public Health Alert, |